In case of an AI incident, is your organisation prepared?

One warning. Three decisions. Take command.

Autonomous agent Critical

Your AI agent initiates unauthorised payments.

An alert flags payments to a new supplier. Your agent initiated them without human approval and can still initiate more.

Your role: Operations director

  1. Contain

    A tested stop mechanism, restricted access and preserved logs.

  2. Coordinate

    An incident owner and an escalation path across finance, security, leadership and relevant partners.

  3. Recover

    Isolated testing, transaction limits, human approval and monitored alerts.

Data exposure High

A client file was shared with an unapproved AI tool.

A team member uploaded a file containing client information to a public AI tool. Its retention terms are unknown.

Your role: Operations lead

  1. Contain

    A reporting procedure, an approved-tool inventory and preserved evidence for analysis.

  2. Coordinate

    A documented assessment with privacy, security and legal owners, including applicable obligations.

  3. Prevent recurrence

    Approved tools, data minimisation rules and training matched to actual use.

Recruiting bias Significant

Your recruiting AI ranks comparable candidates differently.

Before approving a shortlist, your team notices unexplained differences between candidates with comparable qualifications.

Your role: HR director

  1. Protect decisions

    A way to suspend recommendations and human review against job-related criteria.

  2. Understand

    Documented criteria, tests suited to affected populations and review with HR, technical and legal owners.

  3. Control the restart

    Acceptance criteria, explicit human responsibility and regular review of decisions.

Customer chatbot Moderate

Your chatbot promises delivery dates you cannot meet.

Several customers received delivery dates invented by your chatbot. The team discovers the discrepancies when customers call.

Your role: Customer service lead

  1. Correct

    Human handoff and the ability to disable unreliable answers on a specific topic.

  2. Restore trust

    A correction owner, verified information and a process for communicating with affected people.

  3. Make reliable

    Current sources, test cases, refusal to answer without reliable data and a reporting procedure.

Internal summary Low

An AI summary misses an important action.

An AI-generated internal meeting summary omits an action and its owner. It is still a draft and has not been shared.

Your role: Team lead

  1. Verify

    A check of actions, owners and deadlines against the source notes.

  2. Clarify

    Action validation by the people involved and a contact for correcting errors.

  3. Improve practice

    A short pre-sharing verification routine and regular review of observed errors.

Back to AI readiness situations