AI system evaluation
Move 38: the single evaluation against the four frameworks. Mapping of uses, intentions, dependencies and weak points. You leave with the Index, the profile and the roadmap.
The methodAI advisory firm
Evaluation, compliance, security
The AI advantage in business comes from usage that is defined, framed, measured and governed. Getting there requires building team capability. Sustained AI confidence requires ongoing evaluation. identifiable is here to guide you.
the AI id framework · profile across six properties
What is it standing on?
The AI id framework makes your AI nameable: a profile across six properties, scored on evidence.
DefinedHow does it know?
The AI Index: a weighted sum where every figure can be reproduced from the inputs.
MeasuredWhat can it defend?
A targeted roadmap, and at the threshold, the "Responsible AI Organization" designation.
Defensible01 · Defined
Six properties, each scored from 0 to 100 on evidence. The weighting is derived from the four frameworks through an emphasis matrix: it holds up, it is not asserted.
Traceability and accountability for every assisted decision.
AI policy, roles and lifecycle: defined and upheld.
Controls and defences specific to AI risk.
Control over data residency, portability and dependencies.
Human oversight calibrated to risk.
Configurations and results documented and replayable.
02 · Measured
The weighted sum of the six properties places the organization on a scale from 0 to 100, across four posture bands. Most organizations start in the Developing band. A starting point, not a verdict.
Four frameworks that carry different weights, reduced to a single figure: ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF, the AI Act and Law 25 converge in the AI id framework, and the figure is reproducible.
03 · Defensible
0 / 100
Designation awarded this year.
Reference band · Responsible AI Organization 2026
An Index has value only if it can be defended before a board, a regulator or a client. The AI id framework produces a reproducible figure: every point recalculates from the documented inputs.
The threshold is real: Index ≥ 70 and no property below 60. The designation attests a state and a trajectory, not a stamp.
Move 38: the single evaluation against the four frameworks. Mapping of uses, intentions, dependencies and weak points. You leave with the Index, the profile and the roadmap.
The methodAI management system readiness (ISO/IEC 42001), NIST AI RMF alignment, Law 25 compliance. The framework that sustains adoption without freezing team agility.
Our servicesAI literacy, skills transfer, using AI systems at full capacity without exposing the business or its clients. Practical templates grounded in the AI id framework.
Our programsCertificate of completion for the Move 38 program, and at the threshold, the "Responsible AI Organization" designation. The seal attests a state and a trajectory, renewed after annual re-evaluation.
The designationA six-property structure (Accountable, Governed, Secure, Sovereign, Supervised, Reproducible) that evaluates an AI system on evidence and produces an Index from 0 to 100, weighted from ISO/IEC 42001, the NIST AI RMF, the AI Act and Law 25.
No, and that is deliberate. identifiable attests a state and a trajectory toward reference standards. The firm is not an accredited certification body and does not claim to be. That precision is exactly what makes the designation defensible.
identifiable's evaluation program: a single assessment against the four reference frameworks that produces the AI Index, the six-property profile and the roadmap. The name comes from the AlphaGo match: capability was Move 37. Responsibility is Move 38.
For organizations whose AI adoption has outpaced their governance. The executive who must answer to their board, the compliance officer exposed to Law 25 and the AI Act, the operations leader who wants AI uses that are nameable, measurable and replayable.
No. The window to put the framework in place is now, before uses harden. The Index is not an exam, it's a map. Most organizations start in the Developing band. A starting point, not a verdict.
The most useful first step is the diagnostic, or a thirty-minute discovery call. Scope is defined together; the figure follows from the framing.